In the spirit of At Will Employment and Non Competes…

Shane August 28th, 2008

These things should be made illegal.

At-will employment is a doctrine of American law that defines an employment relationship in which either party can break the relationship with no liability provided there was no express contract for a definite term governing the employment relationship and that the employer does not belong to a collective bargain (i.e. a union).

Sounds fair, but it isn’t. The company I worked for that used At-will employment would hold the idea over your head. “Everyone here works ‘At Will’, no one is indispensible…’ And yet whenever an employee left, they were criticized if they did not give two weeks notice, and the management of the company would often give bad references to those employees that left unexpectedly, or often even to those that even gave notice. If the company was put into a bind due to the employee leaving, they were vindictive. (Since they never cross trained any employees, they were always screwed when an employee left that did an important job, since no one else could take over those responsibilities.)

Social commentary in Batman.

Shane August 18th, 2008

Heath Ledger as the JokerYes, I know I am late to the party making comments about the recent Batman movie.

Have you ever bought a car and then noticed how many other people have that same car? It seems that suddenly, everyone owns your car.

I wonder if this is why I see political and social commentary in movies and TV shows now. Did I just not see it before, or am I more attuned to it now, being more involved in what goes on in the world? When watching Batman I thought that I was reading too much into it, yet this interview with Alan Moore, the author of Watchmen and V for Vendetta makes me think otherwise. The important quote in the Alan Moore link is when the interviewer informs Moore that activists were setting up tables outside showings of V for Vendetta explaining to people that the movie company had removed most of the politics of the movie. Moore replies:

Why won’t God heal Amputees?

Shane August 2nd, 2008

I think I posted this awhile ago, and hate just posting a video without being able to add anything to it, but this video is too great to not pass it along.

There is no such thing as “The Haves and the Have-Nots”. There are “The Haves and the Have Betters”

Shane July 29th, 2008

American IdolImage via WikipediaMaybe this expression is regional, and only used where I live. The quote “the haves and the have-nots” is often used when talking about the rich vs the poor, but I think it is incorrect.

For our society to function smoothly, you must make sure everyone ‘has’ something, and then offer the rich people the same item, but better.

If you really had Haves and Have-Nots, a society would have trouble.

Think about this. Almost everyone in the US has a car. Rich people just have nice cars. Everyone has shelter, but some poorer people have to rent, or have an older ‘fixer upper’ house (It isn’t old and shabby, think positive! It’s a ‘fixer-upper’! Just fix it up silly!).

Please vote on my poll.

Shane July 24th, 2008

(Update, poll removed, as it was severely slowing down page loads.)

Look to the right –>

I try not to just post about some news that is on TV or in the major newspapers. Unless it is huge, or I feel I can offer an alternative view on something, I do not post about anything I consider common knowledge. This is called blogspam, and I hate it. Too many blogs will post ‘Obama is in Iraq today, I love it!” and link to a major site, newspaper, etc. If I feel I can offer an alternative view, or show that what is being presented by the major media is skewed, then I will do this.

Otherwise, I try to use information from multiple sources to provide people with a better picture. I make exceptions if I feel that what I am writing about is not common knowledge. For example, I just read an article written in the 1970s by an award winning Economist that clearly explains what causes ‘booms and busts’, recessions, the Great Depression, and why we continue to use our system, knowing that it causes such instability.

I will be posting about this article soon, but might only use it alone as a source. I feel though that the knowledge is not common knowledge, and that I can make it a little easier to read for people who are like me: blue collar people who are trying to understand what is going on. I have spent almost two years learning about our government and our financial system, and I think what is missing is that Economists are like Computer Geeks (I am one, I can say this): they talk over the average person’s head. Any time you have specialized knowledge, you have to remember that most people will not understand what you are talking about. I know if I had read this article two years ago, I would have been lost. Now though, I can understand it. My goal is to make it so anyone can understand what this guy is saying.

My poll is to ask readers if I should continue to only post the way I do, or should I post more, even if I cannot offer any further insight into what I am posting. Example: Keith Olbermann last night showed how CBS removed McCain’s mistake about the Surge in Iraq. Normally I will not post this, unless I can provide other information to add to it.

So far it seems people do not want this sort of thing on the site, but even though I get 100-150 people a day visiting here, only 5 people have voted in the two weeks that the poll has been up. :)

I am very interested in people’s opinions on this.

Next »